PMX: Yang Sebenarnya Tentang Minyak

akmal

Kitty_catz replied at 30-3-2026 06:24 PM
tak tahu la chuols.. meols lagi suka wait and see these 2 weeks apa jadi, bila nak pegi tu?

yes ...

Plan nk g lps raya haji ni

Kitty_catz

akmal replied at 2-4-2026 10:30 PM
Plan nk g lps raya haji ni

ai seee, i dunno kaka.. susah nak advise sbb china sana most keta2 pun ev, depa pun self sustain, barang makan produce sendiri
sbb depa bukan net importer mcm kita, depa net exporter

dah pegi nanti hapted

Samerosie

airfilterkotor replied at 30-3-2026 08:38 PM
Biaq pi la dengan dia sis. Asalkan dia menaip dengan penuh bahagia sudah.
Orang lain juga mem ...

Anyway, si Tamim Dahri tu dah pulang ke Msia blom?
Katanya dia letak syarat-syarat kalau nak pulang ke Msia.

Kalau balik pun senyap2 la kut ikut siam. Lari pun ikut siam.  Muka jawa camni mana leh duduk negeri ereb lama2 duk makan nasi minyak sapi kering sajork.

terma2nkondisi2

ingatkan tadi ada la update berguna kat tred ni pasal krisis minyak ke atau yg berkaitan.. tengok2 pasal tamim dahri lagi .. ke acik2 porem yg dok sebut2 ni sayang sangat kat tamim dahri

mcm ada sekor walanon bongok tu.. masa isu kg sungai baru tu tengah hangat.. dok ulang2 sebut pasal shahidan kassim dan annuar musa.. mungkin sayang sangat la tu dah selalu sangat sebut tu

kemaruk

tak masuk dek akal najib mampu stabilkan harga minyak malaysia walaupon 3 tahun berturut turut minyak atas USD100 dari 2011-2014

hebat nya najib

dicemburui kawan dan lawan

terma2nkondisi2

https://newswav.com/article/opinion-is-malaysia-a-net-energy-importer-or-exporter-A2604_WnvG9l

OPINION | Is Malaysia a Net Energy Importer or Exporter ?

If Malaysia is a net energy exporter, shouldn’t we be told to celebrate the spike in oil prices, instead of brace for hard times?

Why?

This is the question on the minds of many Malaysians.

If Malaysia is a net energy exporter, then rising global oil prices should be a blessing. That is not an ideological claim — it is a basic economic expectation. When the value of what a country produces rises, national income rises. When national income rises, citizens should benefit.

Even Nomura, one of the world’s largest investment houses, confirms it: Malaysia is among the few countries expected to benefit from the oil price spike triggered by the Middle East conflict. Higher oil prices, they argue, strengthen external balances, keep growth resilient, and improve government revenue. In simple terms: when oil prices go up, Malaysia earns more.

So naturally, the next question follows — almost too obvious to ask: If the country earns more, shouldn’t the people feel it? Shouldn’t higher national profits translate into stable fuel prices, cushioned inflation, and a government confident enough to shield its citizens from global shocks?

Instead, Malaysians are told the exact opposite.

We are told to brace.

We are told subsidies may not hold.

We are told the government is operating in “crisis mode.”

Transport Minister Anthony Loke put it bluntly:

“The government is operating in crisis mode now. Even though we don’t feel it in our daily lives, the world is facing a global crisis. This is not something to be taken lightly or joked about; it is a very serious matter.”

Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim, meanwhile, cautioned:

“We have enough fuel reserves to keep the supply of RON95 petrol and maintain the price of RM1.99 per litre at least until May. But after May, if the war continues, we cannot guarantee that the supply will not be disrupted. This is something we all need to pay attention to.”

And here lies the paradox: even Petronas Dagangan Berhad, a government-linked corporation whose revenues should logically rise in tandem with global oil prices, is framing the surge as a looming crisis. Its public statements makes it sound as if Malaysia is an energy importer rather than exporter, while emphasizing supply constraints, rising operational costs, and global market volatility — to effectively make it sound as if Malaysia cannot benefit from the spike at all.

So we are left with a glaring contradiction:

• Nomura says Malaysia profits.
• Petronas Dagangan says rising oil prices threaten stability.
• The Transport Minister calls it a crisis.
• The Prime Minister says subsidies may not last.
• And the people? They are expected to pay more, feel less, and accept it as unavoidable.

How does that make sense?

If rising oil prices increase national income, then there are only a few plausible explanations for why ordinary Malaysians are not feeling relief.

The first is leakage — somewhere between national revenue and public benefit, the gains are dissipating through inefficiency, mismanagement, or outright waste.

The second is concentration — the profits exist, but are captured by a narrow segment of corporations, intermediaries, or politically connected actors, rather than being redistributed to the broader public.

The third is structural — Malaysia’s energy reality is more complicated than the “net exporter” label suggests. Domestic consumption, declining crude production, and refining dependencies mean that even if the country sells oil at higher global prices, the government may not be able to immediately translate those profits into lower consumer costs.

Even this explanation, however, raises questions. If structural limitations are the reason, why have the government and Petronas Dagangan not provided clear data to back it up? Why are Malaysians left to infer a crisis that, according to independent analysts, should not exist?

The absence of clarity amplifies the contradiction. When a government-linked corporation and the state itself hint at crisis while external analysts confirm profit, public trust erodes. It starts to look less like a technical challenge and more like a political choice: profits exist, but ordinary citizens are not beneficiaries.

And here, a new dimension emerges: is the government attempting to stifle the very questions citizens are asking?

Prime Minister Anwar has urged the Royal Malaysia Police (PDRM) and the Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission (MCMC) to crack down on so-called “fake news” regarding fuel and electricity prices. In a video message, he said:

“We are operating under extraordinary circumstances with mounting challenges, yet this does not stop those who continue to lie, spread hatred, sabotage, and betray. Firm action must be taken, as the dissemination of false information is an irresponsible act that impacts the public. These acts are carried out solely to secure narrow political gains, with no regard for their impact on the people.”

On one hand, misinformation must be addressed. But on the other, the government’s move raises an uncomfortable question: are Malaysians being warned not to ask why they must endure hardship in a time when the nation is allegedly profiting? Is the crackdown on “fake news” inadvertently—or intentionally—attempting to suppress legitimate debate about why rising profits are not translating into public benefit?

This is not just about economics. It is deeply political.

A population will tolerate hardship if it believes the burden is shared, necessary, and fairly managed. But when hardship appears disconnected from national reality — when a “profiting” country produces a “suffering” people — that tolerance erodes.

And that erosion is already visible. Discussions on social media, in communities, and in business circles increasingly question not just fuel prices but the very management of state revenue. Citizens are asking uncomfortable questions:

• Where is the money going?
• Who benefits from rising oil prices?
• Is the system designed to serve the many or merely protect the few?

By acknowledging the severity of the crisis while simultaneously allowing a government-linked company to frame it in alarming terms, the state risks deepening public cynicism. Citizens are asked to trust assurances that are contradicted by entities responsible for managing national resources.

Ultimately, the issue boils down to credibility. Hardship alone may not trigger unrest, but hardship that defies logic, wealth that bypasses the public, and profits concentrated in the hands of a few is combustible.

Because in the end, people do not revolt against suffering alone. They revolt against suffering that makes no sense.

And right now, Malaysia is being asked to endure precisely that — at a time when global circumstances should be a blessing, not a burden.

pengecatbintang

harian malaysia :

import/ guna 700,000 tong

export 500,000 tong

reality yg berlaku

let say harga global crude oil (paper) USD120

tp   

kalo nak fizikal crude oil tu - kena bayaq premium

katalah USD150

la ni..

dah berlaku

tanker patutnya ke India tp sampai Jepun

tanker patutnya sampai ke Europe tp otw ubah haluan ke Asia

trader2 crude oil offer harga lagi tinggi masa kapal tu otw ke destinasi negara pembeli asal

pengecatbintang

pengecatbintang replied at 5-4-2026 12:53 AM
harian malaysia :

import/ guna 700,000 tong

ni ha..

https://x.com/DarioCpx/status/2040430200882909223

https://x.com/BurggrabenH/status/2040427983563882539

Paper Brent is at $109. Physical Brent is at $141

Physical is the price if you need oil now. Paper is theprice if delivery can wait until June

However you look at the Middle East, this will not befixed in a few weeks.

https://x.com/KarelMercx/status/2040120246716015042

pengecatbintang

pengecatbintang replied at 5-4-2026 12:57 AM
ni ha..

https://x.com/DarioCpx/status/2040430200882909223

perlu diingat..

crude oil harga global ni blom lagi refine

import crude oil -> lepas tu kena refine kat refinery plant

harga selepas tapisan di refinery lain

mejaputih

Batik Air Malaysia kurangkan penerbangan, tawar cuti tanpa gaji susulan kenaikan kos bahan api
[Artikel dari Astro Awani]

KUALA LUMPUR: Batik Air Malaysia akan mengurangkan sehingga 35 peratus jadual penerbangannya bagi separuh pertama April berikutan peningkatan mendadak kos bahan api yang didorong oleh ketegangan geopolitik di Asia Barat.

Dalam memo dalaman bertarikh 1 April, syarikat memaklumkan bahawa langkah ini diambil sebagai pendekatan berjaga-jaga untuk melindungi kedudukan kewangan ketika harga bahan api jet berada pada paras tertinggi.
Sebagai sebahagian daripada usaha pengurusan kos, Batik Air Malaysia turut menawarkan cuti tanpa gaji secara sukarela kepada kira-kira 3,500 kakitangannya dan permohonan dibuka sehingga 3 April, dengan tempoh cuti bermula 6 April.

Ketua Pegawai Eksekutif, Datuk Chandran Rama Muthy, mengesahkan bahawa situasi semasa menunjukkan bekalan bahan api global semakin terhad dan dijangka hanya mencukupi untuk beberapa bulan akan datang.

"Syarikat perlu mengambil langkah proaktif dalam mengurus operasi bagi mengurangkan risiko kewangan dan memastikan kelangsungan perniagaan dalam jangka panjang.

“Jika operasi diteruskan tanpa pelarasan, ia boleh meningkatkan risiko kewangan dan operasi, serta memberi kesan kepada kestabilan keseluruhan industri penerbangan,” katanya.

Beliau turut menegaskan bahawa keputusan ini bukan mudah, namun perlu dalam situasi yang mencabar dan tidak menentu ketika ini.

Langkah tersebut juga selari dengan kebimbangan yang dibangkitkan pihak industri mengenai kekangan bekalan bahan api.

Batik Air Malaysia berharap para penumpang memahami situasi ini dan terus memberikan sokongan, sambil syarikat berusaha mengekalkan operasi yang stabil, selamat dan boleh dipercayai sepanjang tempoh ini.

zehra2

ler.. betul laa stok minyak mmg sampai mei je..
kapal yg lepas kat selat hormuz cuma bawak kargo..
kapal minyak belum lepas lagi

zorrro_03

ada tak babi2 pentaksub dalam ni yang sudi tampal vt formula turun minyak 24 jam????  

zehra2

slavehunter replied at 24-3-2026 09:13 PM
Tapi aku dengar pula Iran jual minyak kat China lalu strait mallaca tukar kapal kat tengah laut rebr ...

hmmm berani ke pmx belikan peluncur roket dari china utk iran.
sebab china tak nak jual terus.. jd dia minta malaysia yg beli. dpt la minyak
berani ke..

slavehunter

zehra2 replied at 6-4-2026 08:17 AM
hmmm berani ke pmx belikan peluncur roket dari china utk iran.
sebab china tak nak jual terus.. jd ...

I don't know about this. Tapi military Intel both Iran and China they share in common.

kemaruk

baru 3 minggu naik cecah 100usd dah gelabah naik diesel macam nak kiamat esok

najib selamber jer 3 tahun berturut turut minyak atas usd100 naik sen2 je

siap bagi macam2 bantuan, projek jalan sini sana, takde gelabah krisis kulu krisis kilir

cuci jamban je la level madani ni

kemaruk

maybe pmx atau macai2 beliau boleh bagitau "yang sebenarnya tentang minyak pada tahun 2011-2014 (bukan sebab rosmah nak beli cincin)"
baru lah masyarakat tak troll lagi dah

axl_bach

kemaruk replied at 6-4-2026 03:51 PM
maybe pmx atau macai2 beliau boleh bagitau "yang sebenarnya tentang minyak pada tahun 2011-2014 (buk ...

Masyarakat yg mcm Derkem dan swaktu dgnnya, yakni yg mmg hardcore UMNO/Najib nk troll xder hal.....

Ni yg troll pun sama2 haramjadah dlm Barisan Pembangkang dulu, sama2 janji nk hapuskan PTPTN, baik balik sumbat kepala dlm lubang jamban....

vietnamdulich

good

akmal

Kitty_catz replied at 3-4-2026 08:53 AM
ai seee, i dunno kaka.. susah nak advise sbb china sana most keta2 pun ev, depa pun self sustain,  ...

Salam sis..kita dah balik Dari China ..stay kt Pudong sbb dkt ke Disneyland and kt nanjing road utk jln2 area situ ..sempat day trip ke Hangzhou by HSR..had enjoyable trip.. kumpul yuan utk pergi area China yg lain..maybe yunnan dan harbin