|
|
Patut imam tu baling la kerusi ke meja ke..baru la puas hati dpt 12 bulan..takat baling selipar dpt 12 bulan x berbaloi langsung.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply 76# Arlina
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bukan ada yg mencuri duit rakyat pun kena setahun penjara juga?  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hahahahah tajuk tak boleh blah... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
kalau main tuju kasut lepas ni boleh masuk penjara dak?  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mahkamah terhina pun kena penjara 12 bulan 
adil sungguh hakim yang jatuhkan hukuman tu  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mahkamah pun boleh terhina ke hulu ke hilir  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
apa salah imam ini?
sebelum bersalah sbb baling selipar. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply 77# AHMADVW
mestilah ada...  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Seeing how throwing slippers to Federal Court judges is a small issue to you, I thought perhaps ...
Maideen. Post at 9-3-2012 15:58 
the throwing is only meant to the reaction of frustration bcoz there are no justice that the imam hope to seek. you however come with your own theory that it is upbringing la, brought up in such environment la and so on. it is all comes from you, from your head.that is totally not true to relate such action with their whole life and environtment. but it is understandable to me after all you are well known to make stereotype of other people. lobai pas la, lobai isle la, and many more. 
what i mean is the act of throwing is RELATIVELY small comparing to the act of corruption by khair toyo. throwing maybe, bring harm to one or two people, but corruptions? LOTS OF PEOPLE. same goes to you when it comes to the situation you stated above. see? i can also come out with the idea of how you think corruption is just a small matter. and i can also relate to how you are brought up in such environment, family of corrupt and so on.but i dont want to.
my stance is clear. all we need is justice applied to all of the ciitizen regardless of their status. if the imam act is againts the law then he deserve to have the sentence.same goes to toyo. but the reality???????? lu pikirla sendiri............ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pakcik ni mesti terer main baling2 selipar masa kecit2 dulu....heheh....permainan apakenama tu hek? tak ingat....polis sentri? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
apa salah imam ini?
sebelum bersalah sbb baling selipar.
umisha Post at 9-3-2012 19:05 
Kisah sebenar:
1. Imam PAS telah di suruh keluar dari quartersnya kerana masalah disiplin.
2. Imam PAS tidak puas hati dan membawa kes perintah keluarnya ke Mahkamah Tinggi dengan menamakan Jabatan Agama Islam Wilayah sebagai defenden.
3. Imam PAS kalah di mahkamah tinggi dan oleh itu terpaksa keluar.
4. Imam PAS merayu kepada mahkamah Rayuan.
5. Tiga hakim diMahkamah Rayuan menolak rayuannya.
6. Imam PAS mahu merayu ke Mahkamah Persekutuan tetapi Courts of Judicature Act memperuntukan bahawa sebarang kes yang mahu di rayu ke Mahkamah Persekutuan mustilah dibuat dengan kebenaran Mahkamah Persekutuan dahulu.
7. Semasa Mahkamah Persekutuan mendengar permohonannya untuk mendapatkan kebenaran untuk merayu, Majlis Agama Islam telah membuat bantahan kerana Imam PAS telah lewat membuat permohonan. Bantahan ini telah di terima oleh ke tiga tiga hakim Mahkamah Persekutuan.
Perlu di ingat di Malaysia kini terdapat apa yang di panggil "4 judge rule" di mana jika Mahkamah Tinggi (satu Hakim) dan Mahkamah Rayuan (3 Hakim) dah buat keputusan, Mahkamah Persekutuan tidak akan membenarkan rayuan di buat ke Mahkamah Persekutuan melainkan, diantaranya, ada isu baru yang berkepentingan awam yang sepatutnya di dengar oleh Mahkamah Tertinggi Negara itu... Oleh itu Maideen mjenyatakan, walaupon Imam PAS itu telah memohon kebenaran dalam tempoh masa yang dibenarkan, permohonan nya untuk diberi kebenaran untuk merayu tetap tidak akan berjaya. 
8. Semasa permohonan Imam PAS ini di tolak lah Imam PAS ini membaling seliparnya ke arah Yang Amat Amat Arif Hakim Hakim Mahkamah Persekutuan itu dan kena Timbalan Pendaftar Mahkamah. 
Jika di baca laporan Malaysiakini:
The incident took place just after 10am when the three-man bench led by Chief Judge of Malaya Justice Zulkifli Ahmad Makinuddin rejected imam Hoslan Hussain's application to hear his appeal.
This followed an objection raised by the Federal Territory Islamic Affairs Council (MAIWP) lawyer Zulkefli Che Yong that Hoslan’s affidavit was filed outside the timeframe allowed.
Hoslan (right), who was not represented, was standing at the row of tables where the prosecutors and lawyers are seated.
The imam is said to have argued with Justice Zulkefli and asked him to be lenient, but the judge replied that the bench had to allow the preliminary objection as this was in accordance with the law.
Judge tries to pacify imam
Justice Zulkefli tried to pacify Hoslan, but the imam did not want to listen any longer and suddenly took off his shoe and flung it at the judges' bench.
The shoe narrowly missed the head of one of the judges, but then Hoslan took off his other shoe and threw it - which hit the deputy registrar of the apex court. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply 95# Maideen.
Terima kasih atas penjelasan yg diberi.seperti imam ini tidak dpt menahan sabar dgn dugaan....
menjatuhkan imej jawatan imam.
semoga beliau dpt muhasabah diri di kuarters barunya  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sama sama umisha.
Maideen yakin kalau pon dia tidak dipenjarakan kerana menghina mahkamah de ...
Maideen. Post at 9-3-2012 21:38 
Maideen...apa komen maideen pula mengenai komen penyokong penyokong pakatan rakyat ...
khir toyou kena 12 bulan... imam ini pun kena 12 bulan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
lobai pun orang jugak bukan semuanya dan bersupan-santun. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|