|
|
[Tempatan]
Ini Jawapan Balas Mahathir Kepada YG Mengkritik Dia KAW2 Kerana Bidas Najib.
[Copy link]
|
|
|
aikk, blh pulak mcm ni, semlm confident je pg cek, btw google je la jwpn utk soalan2 tu, dah berjawab pun.
p/s : in case u x tau ssm blh beli online, beli semua the full audit report n cek style forensic audit, work backwards n refer to all the notes of the accounts, 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aku pun lega bila si blasoff ni masuk.... jawapan dia mmg selalu penuh fakta...susah nak taici...kita nak tanya lebih lebih tak reti nak put in words
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
why r u repeating my answer, 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ni satu lg, i was not referring to the bank yg bg loan la blastoff, tlg la bc betul2 posting sy tu.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I tak kata nak tengok hari tu jugak... i kata akan tengok... so, instead bgtau mcm mana nak beli report tu, apakata you bgtau summary saja sbb you defend sangat 1mdb ni sedangkan bloggers mcm flyingkick,kluangdiamond, outsyed the box, annie semua dok persoalkan...bukan setakat drM saja
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
hang ikut x kes ni blastoff, diorang yg hentam 1mdb ni mostly refer to the audit report la, aiyoo, type panjang2, 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21. With regard to my political agenda, what is wrong with that? A Prime Minister must be seen to be clean and able to explain and answer questions and to be good for the country. Najib cannot even answer and has not answered any question, beyond exercising elegant silence or saying the allegations are not true.
i like this statement.. terbaekkkk Tun M..  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
google dulu la scorpionkiki, x pun search thread dlm cari ni refer to my postings, x larat la nak ulang2 jwpn yg sama, ms sy bkn nak habiskan utk mengadap forum ni je. nak jwb semula 1mdb ni kena refer sana sini, bkn main cincai jwb je, ok, 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
or instead u can go to the 1mdb website n go thru their blog, faq, the articles on the right side, etc, etc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ini balasan dr mykemut...WIN sangat, kalu najib tak nampak bersih, tun pun sama jah tak bersih katanya 
Jika Seorang PM Mesti Ternampak Bersih, Tun Tak Akan Sampai 22 Tahun
DAKWAAN Tun Mahathir Mohamad (90 tahun) bahawa Perdana Menteri Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak perlu meletak jawatan kerana dikelilingi pelbagai skandal, adalah satu kesimpulan yang tidak dibuat dengan pemikiran yang sihat.
Kata Tun Mahathir bahawa, a Prime Minister must be seen to be clean and able to explain and answer questions (seorang Perdana Menteri mestilah dilihat bersih dan mampu menjelas dan menjawab soalan), diibarat seperti menepuk air longkang terkena muka sendiri kerana pelbagai skandal yang berlaku pada zaman pemerintahannya pun hanya diakui ‘sebagai skandal’ selepas berbelas tahun Tun melepaskan jawatan.
Antara lain kerugian Bank Negara dalam perniagaan pertukaran wang asing, Perwaja, pembunuhan Jalil Ibrahim, skandal Bank Bumiputra dan sebagainya. Soalan yang dilontar, kalau dijawab pun ketika itu adalah dengan cara dengan sindiran dan sinikal – itupun kalau sinikal dan sindiran diikitraf sebagai salah satu kaedah menjawab soalan.
Sehingga ada yang berkata kepada penulis, jika Facebook dan Twitter sudah wujud pada awal 80 an, Tun Mahathir barangkali menjadi Perdana Menteri selama setahun sahaja kerana selepas mengangkat sumpah pada Julai 1981, skandal Bank Bumiputra dan pembunuhan Jalil Ibrahim menghantui pentadbirannya tak berapa lama selepas itu.
Bagaimanapun yang lebih penting disitu, semua skandal ini – sama ada Tun ada pembabitan langsung atau tidak, membuktikan bahawa Tun sendiri pun tidak dilihat bersih semasa memegang jawatan tersebut, bagaimana menuntut Najib untuk menjadi yang sama?
Kalau Najib mahu kelihatan bersih sekalipun (dan sememangnya beliau bersih), masih ada pembangkang yang akan mengotorkan imej beliau waima semasa pergi menunaikan haji sekalipun. Adakah itu salah beliau kerana tidak dilihat bersih? Tun senang cakap soal penguasaan 2/3 di Parlimen hari ini kerana Tun tidak pernah berhadapan dengan Anwar Ibrahim secara depan berdepan, berbanding Datuk Seri Najib.
Penulis begitupun mendengar bahawa Perdana Menteri sudah bersedia untuk menjawab semua persoalan dibangkitkan Tun Mahathir, cuma tak pasti bila. Harapannya selepas Perdana Menteri berbesar hati menjawab persoalan Tun (sesuatu yang tidak pernah dilakukan Tun dahulu), tidak ada lagi soalan-soalan susulan yang hanya menampakkan isunya bukan Najib jawab soalan atau tidak tapi untuk pihak siapa Tun bertanya dan agenda lain dibelakangnya.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agaknya berapa writer artikel ni dapat dr najib... RM2000 kot
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1MDB yang kena audit skarang ni bukannya Tun M
U should advise that to Najib. Sebelum audit start he should not said that kabinet semua sudah bersetuju bahawa tiada salah laku dalam 1MDB
Audit belum jalan hang dah declare kata tiada salah laku. apa kes ? baik tak payah buat audit langsung
Should the people not curious or suspicious on the outcomes of the audit report ? I think we should 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
kipas besar punya ni.... 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
still u r not answering my q. i told u before he was referring to the audit report. tony pua should know what he should ask during the pac session,
“Setelah menerima penjelasan dari 1MDB dan Deloitte, Kabinet melahirkan keyakinan bahawa tidak terdapat sebarang salah laku dalam 1MDB, dan hasrat mereka supaya syarikat itu dibenar melaksanakan hasil semakan strategiknya yang dicadangkan,” kata kenyataan itu.
Untuk menambah lebih lagi ketelusan berkaitan syarikat itu, kerajaan meminta Ketua Audit Negara pula untuk memeriksa akaun 1MDB sebagai langkah lanjutan.
1MDB telah memberikan taklimat berkaitan keadaan semasa serta menjawab siri pertanyaan yang dikemukakan menteri kabinet, termasuk Najib dan Timbalan Perdana Menteri Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin.
Deloitte, katanya, memberi keterangan menyeluruh tentang urusan mereka dengan 1MDB dan mengesahkan bahawa firma itu telah mengaudit dan mengesahkan akaun syarikat berkenaan.
“Kabinet diberitahu bahawa dakwaan baru-baru ini yang ditujukan kepada 1MDB, adalah berkaitan transaksi pihak ketiga seperti Petrosaudi, bukan 1MDB.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sekarang ini susah mahu differentiate...yg menulis sesuatu itu tegar kerajaan atau tegar pembangkang, kalu tak tengok sumber asal dr mana...sebab ayat2 menyerang mahathir kini tak ubah seperti ayat2 menyerang mahathir tika kemuncak jaman reformasi dulu...macam kopipes pun ada
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the old man still bite..and he bites well
regards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
yg deloitte audit akaun tahun bila
yg org duk hingaq skrg ni pasal akaun taun bila
kes kes kes kes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
deloitte pun pandai juga...memang ler depa sign akaun tuh tapi depa punya notes tuuuuu diaaaaaa aihhh
depa pun nak selamatkan tengkuk depa juga, just in case jadi apa2 suatu hari nanti...idok ler depa2 ni kena pancung sama...spt arthur andersen yg melingkup sbb berselingkuh dgn segala kemungkaran dibuat enron satu ketika dahulu
http://www.thestar.com.my/Busine ... re-funds/?style=biz
Auditors highlight several critical areas in 1MDB's books
PETALING JAYA: The new auditors of 1Malaysia Development Bhd (1MDB) highlighted several critical areas in the accounts for the period ended March 31, 2013, which revealed that a sum of RM5.74 (US$1.58)bil (RM4.9bil) which was meant to be used for the development of the Tun Razak Exchange (TRX) has been placed with overseas investment institutions.
The latest amount invested through overseas licensed financial institutions adds to the controversial RM8.35 (US$2.3)bil that the fund had placed with a Segregated Portfolio Company (SPC) registered in the Cayman Islands on Sept 12, 2012.
Put together, the total amount that 1MDB – which was established by the Ministry of Finance in 2009 – has placed with overseas fund managers amounts to RM13.79 (US$3.8)bil (RM12bil).
The accounts also revealed that the board of 1MDB had concluded that they were not in control of the Cayman Islands SPC and has decided to put the investments there up for sale.
According to the accounts that were signed off by Deloitte, the RM5.74 (US$1.58)bil was part of a RM10.89 (US$3)bil private debt securities that had been issued by 1MDB’s subsidiary, 1MDB Global Investments Ltd (1MGIL), and the debt papers were supported by a letter of comfort from its shareholder, which is the Government of Malaysia.
The amount raised was to be used as seed capital for the development of the TRX that is developed by Abu Dhabi Malaysia Investment Co Ltd (ADMIC).
ADMIC is a 50:50 joint venture between 1MGIL and Aabar Investments PJS.
The Abu Dhabi fund is best known for its rather peculiar entry into RHB Capital Bhd in 2011 as Malayan Banking Bhd (Maybank) and the CIMB Group courted the banking group. The entry of the Aabar group thwarted the efforts of Maybank and CIMB to take over the group.
According to the accounts, the funds were placed while the detailed blueprint of the TRX project was being finalised in institutions that were rated by international credit agencies.
The returns from the investment would be reinvested, meaning 1MGIL will not be entitled to dividends, interest or any other form of distribution of funds. However, the fund may change its distribution policies later.
Among the other pertinent matters raised in the books signed off by Deloitte on March 28 were:
· The directors have decided to classify the RM8.35 (US$2.3)bil placed in the Cayman Islands as an “asset for sale” after concluding that they were unable to exercise control or significant influence over the SPC managing the money;
·The SPC declared a cash dividend of RM484.27 (US$133.4)mil on Sept 12, 2013 and returned RM237.2 (US$65.34)mil as capital to 1MDB;
·In 2013, 1MDB once again booked in a revaluation gain from the land it holds. This time, it was to the tune of RM2.7bil. However, the detailed development blueprints for TRX and Bandar Malaysia have yet to be finalised and the ultimate usage of various plots of freehold land yet to be determined;
·The existing concession agreements of the Malaysian power plants allow 1MDB to renew the power-purchase agreement with mutual consent for three additional terms of five years each. This means there is potential for an extension in the life of the power plants in Malaysia;
·1MDB incurred a goodwill of RM1.19bil for the purchase of the power plants from the Tanjong and Genting groups. This is the premium that it has paid for the assets; and
·The new auditor Deloitte was not engaged to look into 1MDB’s books for the financial years 2011 and 2012.
Deloitte was appointed by 1MDB in December 2013. It is the third accounting firm appointed by 1MDB since its inception in 2009, with the first being Ernst & Young followed by KPMG that had audited the books for the financial year ended March 31, 2011 (FY11) and FY12.
1MDB appointed Deloitte after contending that KPMG could not conclude the accounts. It also managed to obtain a six-month extension from the Companies Commission of Malaysia to lodge the accounts by March 31, 2014.
Deloitte in its notes stated that the accounts gave a fair and true view of the financial performance in accordance with the Malaysian Financial Reporting Standards.
The firm pointed out that 1MDB had decided to adopt the new accounting standards called MFRS from April 1, 2012 with a transition date of April 1, 2011.
This means that the books for FY12 should have been restated, taking into account the new accounting standards.
However, Deloitte had not been engaged to report on the restated comparative information of the accounts and did not audit the 2012 accounts.
“Our responsibilities as part of the audit for FY13 included obtaining sufficient appropriate audit evidence that the opening balances as of April 1, 2013 did not contain misstatements that materially affect the financial position as of March 31, 2013,” Deloitte stated. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by blastoff at 9-4-2015 01:49 PM
Aku ulang ayat kau sendiri tu kerana soalan yang aku timbulkan tu adalah berkait secara langsung dengan ayat kau yang aku ulang tu la .
Kerana apabila kau jawab dengan menyebut nilai 40++ billion dan nilai 50++ billion siap mention kos overhead segala , kau langsung tak sentuh brapa exactly nilai interest loan yang perlu di bayar oleh 1MDB ....
kenapa kau left out bab interest loan tu ? Adakah kerana kau tak tahu berapa atau kerana ia tak penting untuk di ketahui ? Aku tanya kau sekali lagi, berapa interest loan tu sebenarnya , dan jumlah keseluruhan yang perlu di bayar balik tu berapa ? Boleh jawab berdasarkan apa yang kau sendiri faham ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Post time 9-4-2015 12:53 PM
